|
|
Post by EnglishCowgirlE on Jan 4, 2007 21:43:19 GMT -5
Which are you? I'm kinda both... more against it though. I put it like Charlotte's Web. Charlotte said that without spiders, bigs would take over the world. Without butchers, horses, cows, chickens, etc., would take over the world. And it is to control the population of horses. It even horrible, and I want to stop it, and abuse. I also don't wanna start a fight about it...
|
|
|
|
Post by hunterchick on Jan 5, 2007 19:09:31 GMT -5
^ agreed.
|
|
|
|
Post by EnglishCowgirlE on Jan 5, 2007 19:13:06 GMT -5
Yea... I also put it like this: If we rode cows and didn't use horses that much, we would be mad if they slaughtered cows.
|
|
|
|
Post by HunterGirl on Jan 5, 2007 19:24:36 GMT -5
Haha. Yea that's a good way to put it. I agree with you. But sometimes really good horses with a lot of potential are sent to slaughter. I think that is just wrong. But, like you said it's to put a control on them. But I think that horses that have a good life ahead of them are sent there for no reason. It's sad. Lot's of ex-racehorses are sent there. But they could be retrained to jump or something. |
|
|
|
Post by EnglishCowgirlE on Jan 5, 2007 19:25:56 GMT -5
Agreed^ People send their horses there because they didn't win... It's just sick and sad...
|
|
|
|
Post by HunterGirl on Jan 5, 2007 19:36:53 GMT -5
Yeah. It'd be better for them (and especially their horses) if they just sold them. Not send them to make glue! The owners would make a pretty good profit and the horses would have another chance.
|
|
|
|
Post by EnglishCowgirlE on Jan 5, 2007 19:40:27 GMT -5
Yea
|
|
simongingerlove
Full Member
I ive some where over the rainbow cause i rock!!!!
Posts: 178
|
Post by simongingerlove on Jan 14, 2007 10:10:56 GMT -5
im all anti!! cauhey send them as food! and slaughter amazing horses
|
|
